Governed Agentic AI Infrastructure

Agents may act.But only within your company's boundaries.

UNITERA is the customizable AI operating system for company-specific agentic work. It connects company knowledge, capabilities, autonomy boundaries, and controlled execution into one shared infrastructure.

Customizable AI OS — OfferFlow is the first app on the platform and proves the control architecture in a real process.

Agents have models.
But no organization.

01

Missing company context

Agents know prompts, but not reliably the identity, rules, responsibilities, and effective boundaries of the company they act for.

02

Uncontrolled capabilities

Tools and connections are often granted wholesale instead of being controlled per agent, task, risk, and time window.

03

No dependable chain of effect

Between an AI decision and an external action, review, traceable authority, and persisted evidence are often missing.

The risk does not start with the agent's thinking. It starts at the transition from proposal to effect.

System model

Four layers. One control architecture.

Each layer has one clear responsibility. Together they form the infrastructure that keeps agentic work company-specific, controlled, and traceable.

01

Company Brain

The canonical company truth — as executable context for every agent.

  • Identity
  • Rules
  • Knowledge
  • Roles
  • Goals
  • Constraints
  • Executable context
02

UNITERA OS

The control layer between intent and effect.

  • Capabilities
  • Permissions
  • Grants
  • Autonomy levels
  • Risk decisions
  • External effect
  • Evidence and revocation

Every external or privileged action runs through an ExecutionIntent — the OS's universal control object. A Commitment is the stricter form for business-binding effects.

03

Modular Apps

Concrete capabilities for real work. OfferFlow is the first app on the platform; further apps — for contracts, policies, or agent operations — can emerge on the same kernel without inventing their own governance truth.

  • OfferFlow — first app on UNITERA
  • Extensible with private or reviewed apps on the same kernel
04

Connectors

The architecture's connection model: capabilities act on existing systems only through controlled, revocable connections — under the same grant and evidence model as any other capability.

  • Email
  • CRM
  • ERP
  • Document systems
  • Internal interfaces
  • External business systems

Autonomy

Not all or nothing.

01

Standard user

Agentic work with reviewed UNITERA capabilities and clear approval points.

02

Advanced organization

Additional reviewed capabilities, organization-specific rules, and differentiated grants.

03

Deep platform integration

Private tenant capabilities, own policies, role models, and higher autonomy within defined boundaries.

The deeper a company defines its rules and capabilities, the more autonomously its agents can work.

Capability model

Capabilities are objects with boundaries — not blanket unlocks.

The architecture's capability model defines three classes. Every capability carries its boundaries as properties — visible, reviewable, and revocable.

01

UNITERA Capabilities

Reviewed, standardized, and controlled platform-wide.

02

Certified Publisher Capabilities

In the extension model: provided by external publishers, reviewed before release, and clearly marked.

03

Private Tenant Capabilities

In the extension model: company-internal capabilities with their own visibility, review level, and permission logic.

Every capability defines

  • Permitted action
  • Data access
  • Risk class
  • Required role
  • Grant duration
  • Review condition
  • Revocable authority

Governed Agent Flow

From goal to effect — every step under control.

Three scenarios, one control path: the Company Brain binds context, UNITERA OS evaluates role and risk, the strictest effective rule decides — and every effect leaves evidence.

  1. 01GoalThe agent receives the goal of sending a follow-up email to an existing customer.
  2. 02Context bindingcontext boundThe Company Brain binds tone, ownership, and the communication rules in effect.
  3. 03Capability requestrequestedThe agent requests the capability for external email sending.
  4. 04OS evaluationUNITERA OS checks role, risk class, and active grants. External communication: medium risk.
  5. 05Strictest rulereview requiredExternal effect toward customers requires review before sending — the strictest effective rule decides.
  6. 06Review and approvalallowedThe responsible role reviews the draft and explicitly approves the send.
  7. 07Execution and evidenceexecutedThe email is sent. A receipt and evidence are persisted.

Governance principles

  1. 01Foundation rules always take precedence.
  2. 02After that, the next strictest effective boundary applies.
  3. 03The riskier an action, the shorter its grant.
  4. 04Critical effects stay bound to review and approval.
  5. 05External effect counts as proven only with a persisted receipt.
  6. 06Audit and evidence emerge in the process, not afterwards.

Proof — OfferFlow

OfferFlow is the first real app on the platform.

An agent drafts an offer. UNITERA binds context, checks pricing and legal rules, requests the required approvals, and allows the send only after controlled authorization. OfferFlow proves the platform — without reducing it to offer processes. The proof surface shows synthetic artifacts and architecture references; synthetic examples are marked as such.

Claim boundary

UNITERA makes no claim of automatic compliance. The platform provides structure, control paths, review and approval evidence, and audit-oriented traceability for agentic work. Capability classes for external publishers and tenants describe the architecture's extension model.

Interactive demo

Take over the next shift — as a demo.

From “Did someone tell you that?” to “It is in the record.”

Test the governance cockpit without system access. Every state transition runs locally in the browser.

Demo data is static. States are not persisted.

Cockpit preview

Demo mode

Active shift

Planning slice

active

Last commit

4min ago

good

Evidence status

Complete

good

Gate block

None

good

Recent actions

10:42Proposal review closed
10:38Commit gate verified
10:29Evidence run started

Workflow stages

Proposal review

pending

Review new proposal drafts

Commit gate

blocked

Verify the revenue commitment

Evidence run

active

Check evidence and gates

Handoff flow

pending

Prepare customer handoff

Track record

completed

Document the sequence

Don't just define what your agents can do. Define when they may.

The next step is not a generic signup. We discuss your Company Brain and your capability model: which rules, roles, and boundaries bind your agents — and where controlled execution begins.